May 14, 2015
Capital Punishment is a highly controversial and emotional issue which most people seem to have strong arguments for and against. The use of Capital Punishment in America has become a controversy among Americans. Controversy whether to ban Capital Punishment or not has become a top priority for most politicians. On one hand it brings justice, yet on the other its taking a life. These two mind set lead to numerous debates and disputes on the topic and even be linked to other controversial topics like abortion or gun laws. If someone was to believe that capital punishment was just and deserved to the law ...view middle of the document...
Wouldn’t we all love to have a “research job” like that? I think Americans should be more worried about that than if a convicted killer or rapist is put to death.
Some people, although, are not worried about expenses. To them the financial situation is a problem, but isn’t what’s important. It comes down to the question that has been asked for ages, is it right or wrong. Capital punishment is a double edge sword and the debate asks whether that is good or evil.
Capital punishment is a method of avenging punishment. "People that favor the death penalty agree that capital punishment is a relic of barbarism, but as murder itself is barbaric, they contend that death is a fitting punishment for it" (Jayewardene 87). Most retentionists, a person who advocates the retention of something like capital punishment, agree with the statement of “an eye for an eye,” and say execution is the only way to truly satisfy the public as well as themselves. Who doesn't enjoy it when, for example, seeing someone who hit you get hit by someone else. Retentionists feel much the same way about murderers, rapist, or child molesters who are sentenced to die. Criminal of that level cause a mountain of sorrow and anger to the victim’s family and friends, seeing or knowing that person is alive after what they have done is unbearable to them. The only way justice could be served seems to be for that criminal to die. Prisons serve three meals a day and allow inmates to socialize; for someone like that to simply go to jail seems unfair to a lot of people.
Retentionists also believe that the death penalty deters lawbreakers from committing serious crimes in fear of the consequences. A stern sentence, they believe, produces a positive moral influence by the Law Enforcement Act of 1994. It "establishes constitutional procedures for the imposition of the death penalty for federal crimes. It applies to federal statutes that previously carried the death penalty and creates many new capital offenses. As a result of the Act, the death penalty may now be imposed for nearly sixty federal crimes. New capital offenses include the murder of a federal prisoner serving a life sentence, and drive by shootings in the course of certain drug offenses" (Violent crime Act). Fear and intimidation is the way to create moral and obedient citizens. An example of deterrence is during the time New York had no capital punishment policy. Drug offences and murders rates were at an all-time high, as well as gang related crimes. Since Governor George E. Pataki took office and established the death penalty...