A habitual offender is a status usually given to a repeat felony offender. If a person has committed two or three previous felonies or numerous misdemeanors, they may be subject to being labeled a habitual offender. If labeled a habitual offender, increased penalties apply to subsequent crimes committed. The crime itself may also be ranked as a more serious class if committed by a habitual offender. The amount of time served on the sentence is increased also, with less opportunity for reduction of sentences for good behavior and similar reductions. A person who has ...view middle of the document...
I feel that if you continue to be a habitual offender your incarceration should keep getting time added to it if you keep going in and out of the prison system. On the other hand if the crime is a misdemeanor I would not incarcerate that person due to the fact it would cost the tax-payers an arm and a leg. If we wouldn't incarcerate people with lesser crimes we would have more room in the prisons for the felony crimes that take priority over lesser misdemeanors crimes.
People that commit misdemeanors should have to answer for their crimes but i think they should have some type of work program or even community service. I would have to say if you have 2 misdemeanors and a felony then i would feel that prison time should be brought into the picture.
People that commit felonies should be incarcerated due to the fact that they would just keep creating problems for the society. For example a sex-offender sexual assaults someone and is caught red handed, but due to the courts being backed up due to lesser crimes ''misdemeanors'' the sex-offender gets a slap on the wrist and is let go to go out and do it again. I feel that the 3 strike rule is decent law but it has too many stipulations to it state by state. Some states do not adhere to the 3 strikes law.