This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Metaphysics Essay

1418 words - 6 pages

In metaphysics, there have been countless arguments to prove the existence, or absence, of certain kinds of things, such as universals. There have been several attempts find a solution to the problem of universals, an unresolved issue which revolves around the question of whether or not universals actually exist, and if so, which particular form they take. Though there are many possible solutions to this question, in modern metaphysics one of the most popular stances on the issue is Realism, which can be further boiled down into two popular schools of thought, Aristotelian realism and Platonic realism. Although both forms of realism agree that universals are actual entities, they are ...view middle of the document...

A property that must exist, for how else would it be possible to accurately say that the sky is blue, or, for that matter, that anything is anything at all? According to realists, this reasoning in itself is sufficient to commit us to the existence of universals.
Although realism is a popular answer to the problem of universals, there exists another widely-held stance known as resemblance nominalism. This particular school of thought asserts that there are no such thing as universals, simply individuals and the resemblances they share amongst each other. In a sense, nominalism is the antithesis of realism, for a number of reasons. For instance, nominalists have never been satisfied by realists' ability to define the exact boundaries of universals. Realists have suggested that within any one universal there exist infinitely varying degrees of that universal, such as the color blue encompassing the color cerulean, which explains the large amount of variability among particulars that seem to instantiate the same universals. And though this sort of reasoning is sufficient for realists, the concept of universals within universals is still largely irrelevant to nominalists. This is due to the fact that nominalists firmly believe that human beings are incapable of defining exactly what a universal's ideal form is without referencing it against itself, which in itself is a cyclical paradox. And without this ideal form, there is no way to know where one instantiation of a universal stands in relation to the true universal. When does the the color blue stop being blue and become purple? And who has the right to define such borders? In addition, many nominalists argue that universals simply cannot exist due to the fact that they are meant to represent singular entities yet defy a very basic law of physics by being capable of existing in multiple places simultaneously. Platonic realists have suggested that this can be explained by the fact that universals may exist outside of the physical universe, freeing them from the constraints of the laws of physics. However, nominalists have asserted that this type of argument, and realism in general, violates the Principle of Simplicity, a key component of theory building that advocates the use of theories that postulate the least amount of entities. And if the Principle is assumed to be true, then it must follow that nominalism is the more logical solution to the problem of universals, for it attempts to explain the universe in terms of particulars exclusively. By eliminating universals altogether, nominalists have essentially made the claim that what people assume to be universals are nothing more labels given to groups of individuals that resemble one another enough to be categorized under the same universal. It is with this claim that nominalism attempts to disprove realism and solve the problem of universals, and in fact would be quite successful at doing so if not for the fact that, according to realism,...

Other Papers Like Metaphysics

Kuhn's Challenge Of The Logical Positivism Viewpoint

665 words - 3 pages a challenge to an accepted theory appears, the spark into a scientific revolution can develop. Logical positivists argue that observation is the key to assessing the truth of facts and theories, throwing metaphysics and subjective arguments into the abyss of meaningless. Kuhn would argue against this point of view however, bring up the fact that humans aren't unbiased. They aren't simply data collection machines. They are influenced by their

Descartes Vs. Locke Essay

1175 words - 5 pages . Metaphysics ……Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University, 20 July 2010. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. ……<>. Paquette, Paul G. Philosophy: questions & theories. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2003. ……Print.


1070 words - 5 pages Running head: INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Mary Graham American Intercontinental University PHIL201-1304B-11 Nov 17, 2013 Metaphysics is the attempt to say what reality is. Cosmology or how we think the most real things have come into being and ontology the study of what is. To me what is real the things you can touch, smell, see etc., but you also have things that you can’t see that is real. For example God is real; people believe


1607 words - 7 pages body affect and interact with one another. Also when reflecting on metaphysics, otherwise known as the nature of things, I focus on reality and the question of what is it, why is it, and how can we understand it. After taking this course, when I come across anything I am unfamiliar with, such as a different religion than my own, I will ask myself these questions. It is enough to merely dismiss what is unknown without first trying to understand

Origins Of Evil

2311 words - 10 pages classical metaphysics,exceeded the limits of human knowledge).The Lisbon earthquake led to a retraction of the scope of moralevil. Though some clergymen reacted to the Lisbon earthquake by seeking areason and justification in human sins for this natural catastrophe, mostintellectuals refused to do so and philosophers separated and distinguishedbetween natural and moral evils. Jean Jacques Rousseau played a central rolein this shift, by showing

The Conceivability And Divisibility Arguments

8415 words - 34 pages question we might to ask is why there could not be a single substance that is essentially thinking and extended. Here are the short answers to these questions. In Descartes’ metaphysics, substances are defined by principal attributes and all properties of a substance are modes (≈varieties, different ways) of that attribute. Extension is the principal attribute of substance because shapes are different ways of being extended. Thought is the principal

Book Critique

8164 words - 33 pages analysis of Meister Eckhart is complete without a discussion of the Beguines. As an example of Eckhart's thought I will explore two of the dominant themes in his work. One is his understanding of the intellect as the imago Dei of man and the other his metaphysical understanding of being. As William Placher wryly notes, "Mysticism may be in fact the only field in which metaphysics is more controversial than sex." [13] The differences between

Management, Challenges For Tomorrow's Leaders

2544 words - 11 pages he argued, is not the objective question, but the subject truth of one’s own commitment in the face of an objective uncertainty. He attacked the Christianity of his days, as hypocrite, insisting that it was an expression of the herd instinct and personal weakness. He therefore urges a renewal of the Christian faith. Kierkegaard attacks what he considered to be a sterile metaphysics [based on speculative or abstract reasoning] of G.W.F. Hegel who


6575 words - 27 pages Wordsworth's good friend Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who has just published his Biographia Literaria, a book Byron dislikes because it is dense and difficult, something you must read at least twice: "And Coleridge, too, has lately taken wing, / But like a hawk encumbered with his hood, — / Explaining metaphysics to the nation — / I wish he would explain his Explanation." Byron claimed to compose best on horseback and to be able to concoct dozens of lines in

Principles Of Sentancing Recidivist Offenders In Europe

9462 words - 38 pages , “Proportionality as a Principle of Limited Government” (2005) 55 Duke L.J. 263. [43] Kant, Die Metaphysic der Sitten (The Metaphysics of Morals) (1797); Waldron, “Lex Talionis” (1992ú 34 Arizona L.R. 25. [44] Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789). [45] Art. 49(3). The text of the Charter is widely available on the Internet and has been published in the Official Journal (OJ C 303/2, 14.12.2007). For further

Lafarge S.A

2924 words - 12 pages NAME: IHEKANANDU KINGSLEY N. COURSE: MGMT 292 / F12 N01 TITLE: INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDY (LAFARGE S.A.) SUBMITTED: October 5, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION 3 3. DESCRIPTION OF CASE 4 4. VALUES 4 4.1. Types of values 4 5. TEAMWORK 7 6. MOTIVATION 8 7. CREATIVITY 9 7.1. Components of creativity 9 8. CONCLUSION 12 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 13 INTRODUCTION This report aims to provide an in-depth analysis of initiatives pursued by Lafarge as

Related Essays

Effects Of Broken Family In The Academic Performance Of The Students

419 words - 2 pages " C.Ontology or Metaphysics: the study of what is really real. Metaphysics deals with the so-called first principles of the natural order and "the ultimate generalizations available to the human intellect." NATURE is a concept with two major sets of inter-related meanings, referring on the one hand to the things which are natural, or subject to the normal working of "laws of nature", or on the other hand to the essential properties and causes

Phil 1010 Essay

540 words - 3 pages 24 April 2010 Philosophy 1010 Assignment 3 Descartes theory of doubt rest on the Latin phrase Cogito Ergo Sum. Translated into English the phrase means “I think, therefore I am”. This theory hinges on what is real and what is false; and mimics the branch of philosophy called Metaphysics. Metaphysics questions the reality of environment as does the method of doubt. Descartes skepticism (method of doubt) is termed methodological, because it

The Power Of Culture To Create A Better Future

704 words - 3 pages their social, political, economic, and religious norms and modes of organization, thus distinguishing a people from their neighbours. The understanding of personhood, one’s immanent metaphysics and the idea of phenomenal inquiry into the existence generally is rooted in culture. Culture explains, a great deal, the reason why one acts the way one does. Culture shapes man. It makes man read into his environment as to understand what exactly informs a

Individual Ethical Decision Making Analysis Introduction Throughout My Lifetime I Have Dealt With Everything From Priests To Murderers, I Have Witnessed Preachers With No Morals And Thieves With Moral...

732 words - 3 pages scientifically and prove that such a being or person did exist I would believe that to be the truth. With no truth about certain things it is hard to put any kind of faith in them. The more I think about these things the more I believe the scientific method the best way for me to go about life and think about things. I believe that the other two schools are just as good as yours. I just lean a little more towards science then math or metaphysics