Palsgraf V. Long Island Analysis And Case Brief

790 words - 4 pages

Palsgraf v. Long Island Analysis and Case Brief
By: Jeffrey Boswell, Steven Casillas, Antwan Deligar & Randy Durham
BMGT 380
Professor Eden Allyn
26 May 13

Facts
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, filed a suit against the Long Island Rail Road Company. The plaintiff claimed the Long Island Railroad Company’s negligence resulted in injury to her person. A passenger was attempting to board a moving train and lost his footing. The man looked as though he was going to fall. A guard reached out to help the man onto the train and another guard attempted to push him onto the train from behind. The man was carrying a box that was covered by ...view middle of the document...

Rationale
How did the court come to these conclusions? For that answer we must look at the facts. The original ruling, in the plaintiff’s favor, was based on the law. One has to take into consideration the fact that although the servant did not know the contents of the package, there should be some form of liability to the defendant. Acknowledging that the plaintiff stood many feet away from the commotion, it is obvious that her injuries were caused by the actions of the guard.
Looking at the case of Smith v. London and South Western Railway, where a train caused a fire that damaged a building 200 yards away, the courts decided that the defendant be held liable even though the extent of damage could not be foreseen (Smith V. London & South Western Railway Co., 1870).
The appeals court did conclude in favor of the defendant citing the actions of the defendant’s servant did cause legally recognizable injury to the plaintiff, but could not be proven as a breach duty since the package was not marked. Using the reasonable person standard, one could conclude that there was no way the defendant’s servant could have known the contents of the package. The risks from servant’s actions were unreasonable and the dangers that ensued were not foreseeable.
In explaining its decision, the court cited a case tried by the Supreme Court, Parrot v. Wells-Fargo & Co. In that case the defendant, Wells-Fargo & Co., was a tenant in the lower part of a building owned by the plaintiff. A package, having no outward markings indicating its contents, was put in the care of Wells-Fargo; the package contained nitro-glycerin, an...

Other Papers Like Palsgraf V. Long Island Analysis And Case Brief

Religion In The Public Schools: Public Prayer Or Private Action?

5004 words - 21 pages said Constitution." The state appeals court upheld the use of the prayer in the classroom, so long as no child was forced to participate in the prayer over their own objections, or the objections of their parents. The legal issues in Engel v. Vitale all deal with the First Amendment of the constitution. The questions raised in this case were, did the New York Regents violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by providing time

Tourism Essay

9141 words - 37 pages suited to small island circumstances. This p a p e r considers the practice and potential of alternative tourism in Montserrat, a small developing West Indian islanddependency. The first section considers the nature of u n d e r d e v e l o p m e n t on SISODs in general and the d e v e l o p m e n t of tourism. Alternative tourism is also introduced, and examined in the specific context of the Caribbean. The 'small island' problems of Montserrat are

Business Law

1734 words - 7 pages Homework: 1. Case Brief Case Brief: Lumpkin v. Mellow Mushroom Case Name, Citation & Court: Lumpkin, et al. v. Mellow Mushroom, et al, 256 Ga. App. 83, 567 S.E.2d 728 Court of Appeals of Georgia No. A02A0359, Decided June 24, 2002 Parties & Procedural History: Trial Court level: Plaintiff Lumpkin sues Defendant Mellow Mushroom. Defendant filed summary judgment motion, and court granted judgment in favor of Defendant

What Constitutional Issue Did The Supreme Court Take The Case To Answer, And What Was Its Answer?

279 words - 2 pages Long Island Sound with the goal of revitalizing the depressed area. A group of home owners, who lived on the targeted land, including Susette Kelo, decided to fight the issue rather than allow their homes to be destroyed. The Supreme Court case of Kelo v. City of New London established that eminent domain can be used for economic redevelopment projects. The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling against the homeowners established that the Fifth

Brown V. Topeka Board Of Education

1108 words - 5 pages The Significance of the Brown V. Topeka Board of Education Ruling of 1954 Tamara Smith Colorado Technical Institute The Significance of the Brown V. Topeka Board of Education Ruling of 1954 The Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was, and still is considered to be a landmark case which stated state laws which had allowed the establishing of different public schools for African American and

Cost Benefit Analysis

2286 words - 10 pages MBA 439: Business Economics CBA Report Writing Topic: Benefit-Cost Analysis of Pacific Islands Alternative Energy (An Economic Assessment of Renewable Energy Options for Rural Electrification in Pacific Island Countries) Lecturer: Professor Jim MacMaster By Tamaroa Tekeiaki – s11059287. Introduction Is there a way for Pacific island countries to opt for a more inexpensive and environmental friendly power source for rural

Ferry

9466 words - 38 pages communities where fixed links are being proposed. 2.5 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACTS: FIXED LINKS: BERNERAY AND SCALPAY 2.5.1 Introduction The SQW work evaluated the economic and social impacts of the fixed links to Berneray and Scalpay. This was in 2003; a number of years after the links had been opened. The study assessed the impacts through an analysis of: secondary data; and primary research with island residents and businesses. 2.5.2

Prison Industrial Complex

9124 words - 37 pages didn’t suffer. Merleau-Ponty, Nature, 166 Certain carceral practices are often condemned – both by prisoners and by their legal or political advocates – on the grounds that they violate human dignity by treating people like nonhuman animals. For example, in the 1995 Eighth Amendment case, Madrid v Gomez, the treatment of prisoners at California’s Pelican Bay Supermax Penitentiary is consistently compared to the treatment of nonhuman animals.i Some

Minicase Mcd

601 words - 3 pages as the largest and most successful fast food chain in the world. The case study mentions several facts about McDonald’s situation in 2003 which can lead us to make a brief SWOT analysis for a better understanding of the characteristics of McDonald’s at that exact moment. Some of the facts mentioned can be rearranged as the following SWOT analysis: Strengths: dominates the quick service restaurant industry, possess the largest number of

Marketing Rubbish

904 words - 4 pages already fouled things up so, badly, the firm wouldn't have a problem." Such reasoning ignores the fact that the events in the case have already happened and cannot be changed. Even though analysis or criticism of past events is necessary in diagnosing the problem, in the end, the present situation must be addressed and decisions must be made based on the given situations. 6. Narrow vision analysis. Although cases are often labeled as a

Midland Case

572 words - 3 pages =0.066 3. Cost of equity, the EMRP (5%) and D/E (59.3%) was taken out of the context of the case. βa=Equity Beta/(1+D/E)= 1.25/(1+0.593)= 0.78 According to Table1, consolidated D/V is 42.2%, E/V is 57.8%, βe= βa*(1+D/E)= 0.78*(1+0.422/0.578)=1.35 Re=Rf+ βe *EMRP= 0.0498+(1.35*0.05)= 0.1173 4. WACC, the tax rate (38.58%) was from the 2006 taxes paid. WACC= D/V*(1-T)*Rd+E/V*Re= 0.422*(1-0.3858)*0.066+0.578*0.1173=8.49% The division

Related Essays

Case Brief Summary: Marbury V. Madison

1102 words - 5 pages Case Brief Summary: Marbury v. Madison Robert L. Broadwater PAD 525 Strayer University Dr. O’Neal July 09, 2012 Summary of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803). Facts The incumbent president Federalist John Adams was defeat in the presidential election by Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson. The day before leaving office, President John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit

Diamond Fruit Growers, Inc. V. Krack Corp. Case Brief

666 words - 3 pages unequivocally express assent and going ahead and doing business does not constitute unequivocal express consent. Use of Precedent: Neither party pointed to any precedent and through the courts research none were found. One case had been decided on this issue: Mckenzie v. Alla-Ohio Coals, Inc. but it was of no value because there was no analysis to support the decision. There was another case after this one that had similar facts, Advance Concrete

Case Brief Unit 5 Rodman V New Mexico Empl. Sec. Dept

1020 words - 5 pages Legal Analysis and Writing Unit #5 Case Briefs of Rodman v. New Mexico Employment Security Dept. Apodaca v. New Mexico Department of Labor Employment Security Dept. Name of Student Date University Name Rodman v. New Mexico Employment Security Department, 764 P. 2d. 1316 (N.M.1988) FACTS: Billie J Rodman was terminated from her employment with Presbyterian Hospital as a Unit Secretary on February 17, 1987. Ms. Rodman was terminated

Xeco212 Week1 Essay

1771 words - 8 pages . d. met the standards of the profession; it was not reasonable to it to foresee the financial problems that would come about later. status: correct (1.0) correct: a your answer: a feedback: Correct. The firm did not live up to the standard of care expected of a professional accountant. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 In Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad, where Ms