Truman’s Decision - Was the bombing of Hiroshima justified or not?
It was on the afternoon of 6th August 1945 that an event was believed to change and save the world forever. Harry Truman had made a life changing decision to drop an atomic bomb named “Little Boy” in Japan’s Hiroshima. The result of this weapon ended up in destroying more than 4 square miles of the city. The company who made the bomb was called Enola Gay. The motive behind the doing of this was to threaten Japan and make them surrender in World War 2. It is a fact that this was the first time in history that a nuclear weapon was used. This event is still one of the most important topics in history. It has been debated by ...view middle of the document...
It was also a grim threat - a reminder to the world the serious results of nuclear weapon - how dangerous and powerful it was. People were afraid that if another war was to start, another nuclear weapon would be dropped. The founder of SGI Daisaku Ikeda once said:
“Japan learned from the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist” This quotation can tell us how scary and threatening the nuclear bomb was and the impact on many Japanese citizens. Although the quotation only suggested people in Japan as they were the ones who had a first-hand experience, the rest of the world had the same view and believed nuclear bombs and humanity could not coexist. The aftermath left the world in aghast. The destruction was astonishing and it was believed that it left the most damage from just a single weapon in history.
During World War 2, technology of warfare improved by a lot and the use and creation of the atomic bomb was evidently a huge change and advance in the world of technology. This bomb was so powerful that people in the explosion said they could “see a flash from 500m away” from the center. This weapon was believed to be a huge turning point. It was a unique creation which shocked the world and made Americans proud. Because of the event, humankind had a better understanding of the weapon. As A. Garcia Diaz of New York Times noted, the use of atomic bomb had made the world enter "a new phase of stupendous energy-releasing discoveries" and continued praising the making of the bomb. Following the day, Florence Green responded to Garcia Diaz’s article and said "only now can I appreciate the true significance of this stupendous scientific revolution."
Bombing was not justified
However, not many agreed with the dropping of the bomb. Was it really necessary for the bomb to drop in order to make them surrender? Was the lives sacrificed really worth it? Over the years, many still argued that even if it wasn’t for the bomb, Japan would have surrendered if they were given a bit more time so therefore it could be avoided. By doing this only forced them to surrender unconditionally. Unconditional surrender is when a country surrenders without any conditions and it is a dangerous thing to do so because it gives no guarantee given out to the parties surrendering.
“It is my opinion that the use of the barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan ... The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons”. This was something an American navy officer Admiral Leahy said. It can suggest to us that at that time, Japan was already utterly defeated due to the sea blockade. If so, why did they drop the bomb anyway? If only the bomb was not dropped and they were given more time to retreat,...